Understanding Wars through destroyed Architecture

War and architecture are two terms you might never think of connecting, but these concepts have now become intertwined. Wars have always been a cause of widespread devastation, resulting in loss of life, cultural norms, and architectural heritage. Architecture, meant to contribute to shelter, functionality, and aesthetics, assumes a heavier role in times of war: that of a silent witness. When cities are torn apart by conflict, shattered homes and ruins of cultural landmarks become unintentional archives of trauma and resilience, holding within their walls the echoes of violence and survival. 

Buildings as Unintentional Archives

War transforms cities from flourishing hubs to areas marked by destruction. The damaged buildings, from facades of homes and schools to places of worship and marketplaces, unintentionally hold the trauma endured by those who inhabited or cherished them. Structures that withstand bombings and shelling become physical records of war, with each crack telling a different story. 

An example of this is how the Syrian Civil War, also known as the Battle of Aleppo, transformed the thriving city of Aleppo into rubble. Old souks, the Umayyad Mosques, and houses representing culture and history were scarred by bullets and blasted open by explosives, bearing witness to the conflict that ruined lives and communities. 

Another example of this is Sarajevo’s war-torn buildings from the Bosnian War. These buildings continue to remind residents and visitors of the siege that lasted nearly four years. These ruins capture moments of desperation, resistance, and the weight of war, embodying loss and the determination to rebuild.

Trauma and Resilience

War and architecture intersect in every damaged space. A bombed-out school is not just debris-it is a monument to interrupted education, lost childhood, and the determination of a community to teach their young even in the most hopeless circumstances. 

These remains can also serve as foundations for hope. When war and architecture meet destruction, they also become symbols of resistance. For those who remain, standing in the shadow of ruins means reclaiming dignity and asserting, “We are still here.” Each act of rebuilding, whether patching a wall or reopening a shop, becomes an assertion of life over destruction.

Documenting War Crimes Through Destroyed Architecture

Can war and architecture collaborate to testify in courtrooms and history books? The answer to this can be found in the field of forensic architecture, where the analysis of war-torn structures provides evidence of violations of human rights and war crimes. 

Forensic architecture examines the impact of war to map out events and assign responsibility. War and architecture, in this context, become tools for justice. Through satellite imagery, 3D modeling, and examinations of structural damage, experts derive narratives that may otherwise remain untold. These methods have proven to be pivotal, even in more recent conflicts like the genocide in Gaza, Palestine. Analysts are using satellite data and ground reports to map the patterns of destruction, determining the intent behind Israel’s attacks and supporting survivors’ testimonies. This impartial evidence can be powerful in human rights investigations, challenging denial and bringing clarity to chaos. Forensic architecture provides a lifeline, making destroyed structures an advocate for the lived horrors with undeniable evidence.

Echoes of Conflict: What Destroyed Architecture Reveals

The remains of destroyed architecture don’t just tell us what happened; they reveal how and why it happened.

Types of structural evidence include:

1. Precise and concentrated destruction from targeted airstrikes, often indicating a strategic military approach. 
2. Widespread damage from indiscriminate shelling, revealing a disregard for civilian life and a strategy of terror. 
3. Buildings neatly sliced in half and streets reduced to rubble by targeted bombs and chaotic shelling.

These ruined structures hold a symbolic weight that is difficult to evaluate. In some instances, war-damaged structures are preserved as memorials. The remnants of Berlin‘s Kaiser Wilhelm Memorial Church, left standing as a hollow ruin, give an example of how the echoes of conflict can be used to remind future generations of past atrocities and the cost of war.

The architectural testimony of war can significantly impact how conflicts are remembered, and justice is served. For survivors, having their stories supported by physical evidence, such as seeing the ruins of their homes, validates their experiences and anchors their trauma in a shared reality. For communities, the presence of these structures can be a source of collective memory that keeps the past alive.

Preservation vs. Reconstruction

One of the most pressing debates is whether war-damaged architecture should be preserved as a reminder or rebuilt to facilitate healing. War and architecture both influence this decision. Preservation allows a society to remember and learn from its past, serving as a solemn reminder of violence and survival. Rebuilding, on the other hand, helps a community reclaim its sense of normalcy and move forward. Striking the right balance between the two requires careful thought about how war and architecture shape memory, identity, and recovery.

Ethical Considerations

Using war and architecture as evidence raises ethical concerns. Misrepresentation or selective analysis can distort historical truth or manipulate narratives. Forensic analysts and historians bear the responsibility of separating wartime damage from unrelated deterioration and ensuring that the narratives they piece together contribute to justice without distorting history.

In the aftermath of war, architecture stands as more than just ruins. It becomes a silent witness and a keeper of memories, capturing the trauma and resilience of the people it once sheltered. Whether through the lens of forensic architecture or the symbolic weight carried by remnants, these structures tell stories that contribute to collective memory and the pursuit of justice. As the world continues to grapple with violence and its consequences, recognizing and preserving these stories is vital for historical truth, accountability, and healing.

Reference List:

1. Anon, (2022). Destructivism: How does War Affect Architecture? – Arch2O.com. [online] Available at: https://www.arch2o.com/destructivism-how-does-war-affect-architecture/.
2. Architecture, A. (2022). The impact of war on architecture ArchUp NEWS. [online] ArchUp. Available at: https://archup.net/the-impact-of-war-on-architecture/.
3. Vardanyan, A. (2023). The impact of war generations on spatial environment and military resistance challenges in urban planning. E3S Web of Conferences, [online] 436, p.12010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202343612010.
4. Horizon Magazine. (2019). The forensic architects piecing together the story of war. [online] Available at: https://projects.research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/en/horizon-magazine/forensic-architects-piecing-together-story-war [Accessed 4 Nov. 2024].
5. Administrateur K-Sup (2023). Post-war history of construction and architecture – ULB. [online] ULB. Available at: https://www.ulb.be/en/programme/2023-arch-h406 [Accessed 4 Nov. 2024].
6. Forensic Architecture (2019). Forensic Architecture. [online] Forensic-architecture.org. Available at: https://forensic-architecture.org/.
7. Wikipedia Contributors (2024). Siege of Sarajevo. Wikipedia.
8. Society of Architectural Historians. (n.d.). A City that Doesn’t Forget: Sarajevo Thirty Years after the War. [online] Available at: https://www.sah.org/publications/sah-blog/blog-detail/sah-blog/2022/07/08/a-city-that-doesn-t-forget-sarajevo-thirty-years-after-the-war.

Citations for Images:

1. Karwashan Y. The Destruction of Homs, Syria. [Photograph]. (https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/180312124303-01-homs-syria-destruction-file.jpg?q=w_1110,c_fill/f_webp)  
2. Ourfalian G. Great Umayyad Mosque, Aleppo, Syria. [Photograph]. (https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/180312122118-aleppo-great-mosque.jpg?q=w_1110,c_fill/f_webp) 
3. Klawuttke H. The Remains of Sarajevo Tower. [Photograph]. (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/78/Sarajevo_Tower.jpg/1024px-Sarajevo_Tower.jpg)  
4. AA. Israeli Attack on Gaza’s Ibn al-Haitham School. [Photograph]. (https://cdnuploads.aa.com.tr/uploads/Contents/2024/09/21/thumbs_b_c_d41c32b7899dd3a1de26cc59a273db72.jpg?v=214126)   
5. Azaiza M. Living Amidst the Rubble, Gaza, Palestine. [Photograph]. (https://www.instagram.com/motaz_azaiza/p/C0IWNN_oNUY/)     
6. Forensic Architecture. Digital Reconstruction of Al-Ahli Hospital Post Israeli Strikes in Gaza, Palestine. [Photograph]. https://content.forensic-architecture.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Blast_01-768×432.png)     
7. Abna World Service. Targeted Airstrikes on Beirut, Lebanon. [Photograph]. (https://media.abna24.ir/image/jpeg/2024/November/2/ab99ad86-2c71-4211-922a-3f9d684bf039.jpeg)    
8. Euromaidan Press. Indiscriminate Shelling by Russia in Ukraine. [Photograph]. (https://euromaidanpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/avdiyivka.jpg)   
9. EPA-EFE. Targeted Bombings by Russia in Ukraine. [Photograph]. (https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1200×800/public/d8/images/canvas/2024/05/06/9a743316-8ffe-4c7c-8bf0-758bca4dd80c_0e22bc5b.jpg?itok=E3Xeobzj&v=1714976464)     
10. Globus Journeys. Kaiser Wilhelm Memorial Church in Berlin, Germany. [Photograph]. (https://blog.globusjourneys.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Kaiser-Wilhelm-Memorial-Church.jpg)      
11. Bettmann O. Resilience of Hiroshima, Tokyo, Rebuilt After War. [Photograph]. (https://scontent.fbah1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.6435-9/182371588_2570182739803632_1799729599932732299_n.jpg?_nc_cat=103&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=127cfc&_nc_ohc=n7P70D9PTMkQ7kNvgH0oa5Z&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent.fbah1-1.fna&_nc_gid=AR920VrCYcGSAGn66pGKLzy&oh=00_AYDvre-SJ7SNmglo_o84n9ZlXrqY6tTZxDbQtfE980D14w&oe=67506088)       
12.  Azaiza M. Implication of War in Gaza. [Photograph]. (https://www.instagram.com/p/C24pOPosZYI/?hl=en)