Public placemaking projects in India have gained huge attention as cities and communities get united in creating vivid, inclusive, and sustainable public spaces. The one common ingredient of successful placemaking initiatives is community engagement. How precisely such space-making mirrors the needs, wants, and identities of the local population forms the final achievement. This paper looks at the role of community engagement in public placemaking projects within India, with a few case studies and best practices that led to successful outcomes.
Definition of Community Engagement in Placemaking
Community engagement is defined as the active involvement of residents, stakeholders, and organisations in planning, designing, implementing, and maintaining public spaces. The approach places much emphasis on collaboration, inclusivity, and transparency by giving a chance to communities to be heard during development processes. According to Silberberg et al. (2013), effective community engagement may be executed using different tools or methods, such as workshops, surveys, public meetings, and collaborative design sessions.
History of Placemaking in India
From the ancient city squares to modern urban parks, the land of India has always mirrored a rich history of public spaces. The centres that have existed since time immemorial in the form of ghats, bazaars, and maidans have since long served as the centres of social, cultural, and economic activity. However, rapid urbanisation and modernization have almost invariably dealt a blow to these spaces, making community engagement more relevant than ever in conserving their soul while modifying them to suit today’s requirements of the communities being served Desai, 2004.
Case Examples of Best Practices in Community Engagement in India
- Namma Metro, Bangalore
A good example of community-driven engagement in the making of effective public spaces was the Namma Metro project in Bangalore. Metro stations were designed in collaboration with the local communities where the themes reflect the rich cultural heritage of the city. Public art installations, local vendors, and community spaces inside the stations transformed them into hubs of activity (Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation, 2017).
- Janaagraha’s Bala Janaagraha’s Program:
The Bala Janaagraha’s program engages school children with urban planning and governance. The young minds, when involved in such activities, bring feelings of ownership and responsibility toward public spaces. The program has successfully implemented several child-friendly public space projects across various cities, demonstrating the impact of early community engagement.
- Kala Ghoda Arts Festival, Mumbai
Kala Ghoda Arts Festival is an annual cultural event that transforms this Kala Ghoda precinct into a hub of activities in the form of art installations, performances, and workshops. It has been community-driven, bringing together locals, residents, and business individuals to participate in the revitalization of the area and strengthening community bonds, observes Mitra (2015).
- Indore’s Cleanliness Drive and Public Spaces Revamp
Indore, the cleanest city in India, made sure to bring such status through intense community involvement. The municipal corporation made sure to involve house and business owners, as well as schools, in cleanliness drives and public space cleaning. Community meetings, feedback sessions, and public awareness campaigns held regularly kept the community at the forefront of seeing the transformation of the city, 2019).
- Chennai’s Mylapore Tank Restoration
The Mylapore Tank in Chennai was one such successful example of a community-driven initiative in the urban water body rejuvenation process. Residents, heritage enthusiasts, and NGOs worked in association with the city administration to clean, restore, and maintain this historic tank as a recreational public space for the community.
- Ahmedabad’s Riverfront Development Project
In Ahmedabad, the Sabarmati Riverfront Development Project was spread over an extensive period of consultations with residents, businesses, and cultural organisations. The result is a multi-functional public space featuring parks, promenades, cultural centres, and recreational facilities.
- Pune’s Cycle Plan
The Pune cycle plan is a people-driven, sustainable transport initiative for improving public health. The city engaged cyclists, environmental groups, residents, and local citizens in designing and implementing dedicated cycling tracks and bike-sharing programs. Regular feedback and participatory planning sessions were held to ensure that the cycling infrastructure serves its users’ needs.
Benefits of Community Engagement Initiatives
- Improved Social Capital: Community engagement gives rise to the enhanced social capital that aims at developing networks of trust, cooperation, and mutual support among the residents.
- Environmental Sustainability: The Mylapore Tank restoration and the cycle plan of Pune work on green practices and sustainable transport that enhance environmental sustainability.
- Economic Revitalization: The Sabarmati Riverfront Development Project generates local economic activity through the promotion of tourism and fostering businesses.
- Cultural Preservation: Public Art Initiatives and Heritage Restorations: These are like in Jaipur and Chennai enhance the preservation and celebration of local culture. Identity and civic pride are enriched through it. Singh, 2021.
- Better Design and Functionality: With residents engaged in design, public spaces are more functional and user-friendly. It accounts for the unique needs of that area. Gehl, 2011.
Challenges and Mitigation Strategies
- Inclusive Participation is Ensured: The second challenge in this regard is to ensure that all sections of the community have a say in the process, including the marginalised groups within them. This can be overcome by targeted outreach, accessible meeting formats, and representation in planning committees (Arnstein, 1969).
- Reconciling Multiple Interests: Different community groups have multiple interests and priorities that often are at cross-purposes with one another. Skilled facilitation and negotiation may be needed to juggle these. Making the decision-making process open and transparent can sometimes balance out these different interests and deliver what is best for all (Rowe & Frewer, 2005).
- Sustaining Engagement Over Time: It is difficult to maintain community engagement throughout the lifecycle of any given project. Regular updates, celebrating the progress of the project by achieving certain milestones, and continuous opportunities to be involved can help to keep the process interesting and continue the level of participation (Kretzmann & McKnight, 1993).
- Resource Constraints: Community engagement processes can be resource-intensive. It takes time, money, and a specially skilled group of people. Public-private partnerships and using technology for virtual engagement are some ways to curb these constraints (Rowe & Frewer, 2005).
Future Directions of Community Engagement in India
- Leveraging Technology: Digital tools and online platforms are relatively uncharted channels for engaging communities. Social media, mobile applications, and online forums are likely to dramatically increase community engagement reach, supporting wider and more inclusive participation, especially in urban areas. (Nam & Pardo, 2011).
- Policy and Institutional Support: Strong policy frameworks and institutional support are essential for fostering community engagement. Governments and urban planning bodies need to prioritise and institutionalise participatory processes in their development agendas (Healey, 1997).
- Building Community Capacity: A lack of knowledge and skills can impede the community’s ability to effectively engage. In that regard, capacity-building programs and educational initiatives can aim to equip residents with the tools to participate meaningfully in placemaking projects (Chaskin, 2001).
Community engagement forms the bedrock of success for any public placemaking project in India. These case studies reinscribe deeper transformational possibilities in the involvement of citizens in the planning, designing, and execution of public spaces. A process of community engagement that fosters social cohesion, ensures sustainability and reflects the identity of the place is what will make or break the creation of vibrant, inclusive, resilient public spaces. While growing and evolving, the need to remain focused on community-driven placemaking in Indian cities will be very vital in developing spaces that indeed serve their communities.
References:
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35 (4), 216-224.
Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation. 2017. Namma Metro: Engaging communities for a better Bangalore. Retrieved from < https:// www.bmrcl.co.in/cCorporate Overview.aspx.
Chaskin, R. J. (2001). Building community capacity: A definitional framework and case studies from a comprehensive community initiative. Urban Affairs Review, 36(3), 291-323.
Desai, M. (2004). Traditional public spaces in India: Perspectives and prospects. Journal of Cultural Geography, 21(1), 27-45.
Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings: Using public space. Island Press.
Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. Macmillan International Higher Education.
Janaagraha Centre for Citizenship and Democracy. (2020). Bala Janaagraha: Empowering young citizens. Retrieved from [link]
Joshi, P. (2018). Pune’s cycle plan: Community engagement for sustainable transportation. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 3456–3465.
Kretzmann, J. P., & McKnight, J. L. (1993). Building communities from the inside out A path toward finding and mobilising a community’s assets. ACTA Publications.
Lydon, M., & Garcia, A. (2015). Tactical urbanism: Short-term action for long-term change. Island Press.
Madanipour, A. (2010). Whose public space?: International case studies in urban design and development. Routledge.
Mishra, S. (2019). Community engagement in Bhubaneswar’s Smart City Project. Smart Cities and Regional Development Journal, 3(2), 45-58.
Mitra, S. (2015). Kala Ghoda Arts Festival: A community-centric approach to urban revitalization. Retrieved from [link]
Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Conceptualising a smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times (pp. 282-291).
Newman, P., & Jennings, I. (2008). Cities as sustainable ecosystems: Principles and practices. Island Press.
Project for Public Spaces. (2016). What is placemaking? Retrieved from [link]
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of the American community. Simon and Schuster.
Ramakrishnan, D. (2020). Chennai’s Mylapore Tank Restoration: Reviving heritage through community engagement. Water and Heritage, 6(1), 12-23.
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2005). A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 30(2), 251-290.
Shah, A. (2016). The Sabarmati Riverfront Development Project: A model of urban revitalization. Urban Design International, 21(4), 305-317.
Sharma, R. (2019). Indore’s cleanliness drive: How a community mobilised. Journal of Environmental Management, 234, 98–106.
Silberberg, S., Lorah, K., Disbrow, R., & Muessig, A. (2013). Places in the making: How placemaking builds places and communities. MIT Department of Urban Studies and Planning.
Singh, R. (2021). Jaipur’s public art initiatives: Fostering cultural identity and community pride. Cultural Studies Review, 27(2), 178–194.
Purple Line (Namma Metro). (2024b, August 2). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purple_Line_%28Namma_Metro%29
BalaJanagraha. (n.d.). https://challenge.balajanaagraha.org/
Tyagi, T. (2024, January 9). Bombay HC Grants Permission For Kala Ghoda Art Festival, No Commercial Or Food Stalls Allowed. Curly Tales. https://curlytales.com/bombay-hc-grants-permission-for-kala-ghoda-art-festival-no-commercial-or-food-stalls-allowed/
Natarajan, A. (2020, February 14). How ‘nature-based’ transformation of Mylapore tank area could ease Chennai’s water problems. Citizen Matters. https://citizenmatters.in/interview-with-chennai-water-initiative-city-of-1000/
Sabarmati Riverfront – Sabarmati Riverfront. (n.d.). https://sabarmatiriverfront.com/
Apr. (2019, February 15). Pune Cycle Plan Safe Rides for Everyone Everywhere by Prasanna Desai Architects. https://www.architecturepressrelease.com/pune-cycle-plan-safe-rides-for-everyone-everywhere-by-prasanna-desai-architects-2/
Rana, R., Rana, R., & Indian, L. (2021, July 28). The Logical Indian. The Logical Indian. https://thelogicalindian.com/good-governance/cleanliness-swachh-bharat-indore-29929
