District heating is an interesting development of smart city design. The idea is simple: create a heat network that distributes heat generated in a centralised location through insulated pipes to residential and commercial building spaces. So, instead of each building having its own boiler and heating system, it’s being received from a central source. 

Benefits of district heating for urban areas 

District heating sounds extravagant but it offers many potential benefits. A Berenschot study found that it can be nearly 30% more affordable than individual heat pumps, even when considering any social costs. 

Araner solutions provide heat pump systems that help reduce both heat supply and costs. These are more energy efficient than individual heating systems, as the heat is generated in a central plant where it is then distributed through insulated pipes.

This approach ultimately helps tackle greenhouse gas emissions, especially when the central plant uses renewable energy sources like solar or geothermal. This works better in places where democratised renewables (i.e. solar on the roof of urban homes) are not as common, perhaps because many people are squeezed into dense housing blocks in a city. However, there are success stories outside of big cities.

District heating can also improve reliability because the systems are centrally maintained, meaning individual units in buildings don’t need to be individually fixed upon breaking down.

Key components of a district heating network 

The central heat generation plant can come in many forms, from a combined heat and power (CHP) plant, to a waste-to-energy facility or geothermal source. Ultimately, it produces heat. 

This heat is then distributed through very well-insulated pipes to the connected buildings. This might be residential apartments, commercial buildings, shopping complexes, and so on. At each building, heat exchangers transfer the heat from the network to each building’s internal heating system. Thermal storage systems act as a buffer where supply and demand are balanced.

Planning and implementing district heating in cities 

When implementing these systems, a few things stand in the way. Effective planning is of course important, where heat demand density and available resources need to be mapped.

Integrating district heating into urban planning and building codes is perhaps the most difficult step, depending on the city’s developments and regulations. A coordinated approach is needed for the connection of new developments to the network. In many ways, it’s a smoother ride for governments that already possess centralised powers.

Public-private partnerships can help overcome the high upfront costs of infrastructure investment. But policy support, such as subsidies and stable economic incentives are important to attract investors and accelerate project development. 

Engaging stakeholders like local authorities and communities can build a stronger case for its development. In some cases, smaller experiments can be made, such as building a distributed heating district just for a small industrial estate, which can be used as a study case.

In short, centralising heating systems has many advantages. Clear success stories can already be pointed to, such as Finland, where 50% of the total heating market is district heating and even works outside of the big cities. It became popular in the UK after World War 2, and many US states proved its efficiency. While there are many regulatory and development obstacles, successful integration could play an important role in nations hitting their environmental targets.

Author

Rethinking The Future (RTF) is a Global Platform for Architecture and Design. RTF through more than 100 countries around the world provides an interactive platform of highest standard acknowledging the projects among creative and influential industry professionals.